Supreme Court of India
M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. v. Krishna Kant Pandey
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-:- s.2(z) and s. 6 - Termination of service - Disputed before Labour court - Reference dismissed as not maintainable holding that the employee was not a workman as defined uls 2(z) - Writ petition - High Court allowed the petition holding that though the employee was not covered under the definition of workman, he shall be classified as workman - High Court alsc directed the Government to make an amendment in s.2(z) - On appeal, held: Labour court rightly held that the employee was not a workman within the meaning of s. 2(z} - High Court exceeded
Authorities it was built on
- 1986 Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao v. Ashalata S. Guram
- 2000 Indian Overseas Bank v. I.O.B. Staff Canteen Workers Union and Anr.
- 1994 Shri S.K. Maini v. M/s. Carona Sahu Company Ltd. and Ors.
- 2006 Bhogpur Co-op Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Harmesh Kumar
- 1960 M/s. U. P. Electric Supply Co., Ltd. v. The Workmen of M/s. S. N. Choudhary, Contractors and Another
- 2013 M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.