Supreme Court of India
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Preetam Singh and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that no financial liability would stand transferred to the State Government, even in the event of the dissolution of the Vikas Parishad.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965: s.95(1) - Power of Vikas Parishad to make Regulations - Implementation of Pension/Family Pension and Gratuity Scheme by Vikas Parishad for its employees - Vikas Parishad is vested with the right to make regulations so as to extend to its employees such a scheme. Uttar Pradesh State Control Over Public Corporations Act, 1975: s.2(1) - Directions by State Government in regard to 'questions of policies' of Vikas Parishad having regard to "discharge of its functions" - Conditions of service of employees do not constitute the functions of
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 State of U.P. & Ors. v. Virendra Kumar & Ors.
- 2020 State of U.P. & Ors. v. Virendra Kumar & Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.