Supreme Court of India
Bhuvnesh Kumar Dwivedi v. M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the termination of service of the appeltant was illegal and void ab initio.
Judgment, page 30
From the headnote
Labour Laws - Interference with order of Labour Court I Industrial tribunal - Jurisdiction of High Court - Held: High Court can interfere with an order of the Tribunal only on the procedural level and in cases, where decision of the lower courts was arrived at in gross violation of the legal principles - High Court shall interfere with factual aspect placed before the Labour Courts only when it is convinced that the Labour Court has made patent mistakes in admitting evidence illegally or have made grave errors in law in coming to the conclusion on facts - Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts.
Authorities it was built on
- 1963 Syed Yakoob v. K.S. Radhakrishnan & Others
- 2013 Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (d.ed.) and Others
- 2005 General Manager, Haryana Roadways v. Rudhan Singh
- 2010 Harjinder Singh v. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation
- 2012 Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 1976 State Bank of India v. Shr N. Sundara Money
- 2011 Devinder Singh v. Municipal Council, Sanaur
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.