Supreme Court of India

Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2012] 3 S.C.R. 898
Bench T.S. Thakur and Dipak Misra JJ.
Decided 23 March 2012

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In the result these appeals as also W.P. (C) No.144/ 2005 fail and are hereby dismissed with cost assessed at Rs.15,000/-in each case.

Judgment, page 49

From the headnote

The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964: ss. 2(h), 32 and 33 of the Act read with r.133- of the Rules framed under the Act - Market fee - Levy of - Assessment and adjudicatory machinery - Held: Dealers aggrieved of an order of assessment or an order declining 0 refund of the fee paid by them are entitled to question the correctness of any such demand in terms of s.32 which is in the nature of a revisional power vested in the Board - The power vested in the Board including that u/s 32 of the Act could be exercised by the Director as a delegate of the Board keeping in view the

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.