Supreme Court of India
Vijay Dhanuka Etc. v. Najima Mamtaj Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: 171 c s.202 rlw.s.2(g) and s. 200 - "Inquiry" in a case where accused is residing outside territorial jurisdiction of Judicial Magistrate - Nature and purpose of -Held: In such a case, before issuing summons to accused, inquiry uls 202 is mandatory - In the instant case, Magistrate examined 0 complainant on solemn affirmation and two witnesses and only thereafter directed issuance of process -This exercise by Magistrate for purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding against accused is an inquiry u/s 202 - There is no error in
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Birla Corporation Limited v. Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited & Others
- 2016 Abhijit Pawar v. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar & Anr.
- 2016 K.S. Joseph v. Philips Carbon Black Ltd. & Anr.
- 2024 Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2021 Sunil Todi & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- 2021 In Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 of N.I. Act 1881 v..
- 2025 Jaideep Bose v. M/s Bid and Hammer Auctioneers Private Limited
Of those, 3 relied on · 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.