Supreme Court of India
Vijay Jain v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, we allow these appeals and set aside the E impugned judgment of the trial court as well as the High Court.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: s. 8121 (c) - Conviction on the ground of seizure of c contraband goods from accused - Non production of contraband goods before court - Effect of - Held: As the prosecution has not produced before court, the brown sugar alleged to have been seized from appellants and has also not offered any explanation therefor and as the evidence of witnesses to seizure does not establish seizure of brown sugar from appellants, judgment of trial court convicting the appellants and that of High Court maintaining the conviction are not sustainable and, as
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Vijay Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2018 Mohinder Singh v. The State of Punjab
- 2025 Kailas S/o Bajirao Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2020 Than Kunwar v. State of Haryana
- 2019 State of Rajasthan v. Sahi Ram
Of those, 2 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.