Supreme Court of India
Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal v. State of M.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - ss. 8121 (b) - Personal search of appellant and his two employees - Alleged recovery of smack powder - Conviction and sentence u/ss. 8121 (b) - Appeal by the appellant and one of his employee dismissed by the High Court - Appeal before the Supreme Court by the appellant - Held: Independent witness of seizure were declared hostile by the prosecution - It is not clear where the samples were laid or were handled by how many people and in what ways, from the time of the seizure of the narcotic substance till their deposit in the Forensic
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Vijay Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2013 Vijay Jain v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2025 Kailas S/o Bajirao Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2019 State of Rajasthan v. Sahi Ram
- 2018 Mohinder Singh v. The State of Punjab
- 2020 Than Kunwar v. State of Haryana
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.