Supreme Court of India
National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Tuncay Alankus & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the respondent cannot be held guilty of contempt.
Judgment, page 18
From the headnote
CONSTITUTION OF IND/ , 1950: Art. 129 - Contempt petition filed for violation of order of Supreme Court - Held: Respondent cannot be held guilty of contempt of court on the definite charge that he withdrew a very 0 large amount from his account in Pictet in violation of the orders of Supreme Court - The amount had been withdrawn prior to the order restraining the respondent from withdrawing the amount from the account in question - Further, the amount had been withdrawn during the period when there was no attachment order in respect of the account - That being the position, there could be no
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Balwantbhai Somabhai Bhandari v. Hiralal Somabhai Contractor (deceased) Rep. by Lrs. & Ors.
- 2021 Dr. U. N. Bora, Ex. Chief Executive Officer & Ors. v. Assam Roller Flour Mills Association & Anr.
- 2020 The Workmen through the Convener Fci Labour Federation v. Ravuthar Dawood Naseem
- 2014 Ram Kishan v. Sh. Tarun Bajaj & Ors.
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.