Supreme Court of India
Sahdeo @ Sahdeo Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, we reach the inescapable conclusion that contempt proceedings had been concluded without ensuring the compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Rules 1952.
Judgment, page 24
From the headnote
Contempt of Court: c Alleged illegal abduction and detention by police personnel - Suo motu contempt proceedings initiated by Division Bench of Allahabad High Court - Conviction of appellants - Justification of - Held: On facts, not justified - Contempt proceedings were concluded without ensuring 0 compliance of the mandatory provisions of the statutory Rules framed for the purpose (i.e. the 1952 Rules) - The appe/lants were never informed as what were the charges against them - Relevant documents on the basis of which the High Court had taken a prima facie view while initiating suo motu
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/s. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- 2018 R.S. Sehrawat v. Rajeev Malhotra & Ors.
- 2014 Ram Kishan v. Sh. Tarun Bajaj & Ors.
- 2013 National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Tuncay Alankus & Anr.
- 2013 Rajeshwar Singh v. Subrata Roy Sahara & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.