Supreme Court of India
Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
RIGHT TO INFORMATON ACT, 2005 s. 2(h) - 'Public authority' - Held: Public Service · Commission shall be a public authority within the scope of s.2(h). ss. 8(1 )(g), and 11 - Disclosure of names and addresses of members of interview board constituted by State Public Service Commission - Held: If in the opinion of the authority concerned there is danger to life or possibility of danger to physical safety of members, the State Information Commission would be entitled to bring such case within the exemption of s. 8(1)(g) - Direction to furnish the names and addresses of the members of Interview
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Small Industries Development Bank of India v. M/s. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd.
- 2019 Central Public Information Officer, v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal
- 2022 Hdfc Bank Ltd. & Ors v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2020 Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India
- 2022 Dr. Abraham Patani of Mumbai & Anr v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2017 Justice K S Puttaswamy (retd.), and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.