Supreme Court of India
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. The Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd. & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that in a case of default by the employer by an exempted establishment, in making its contribution to the Provident Fund Section 14B of the Act will be applicable.
Judgment, page 27
Authorities it was built on
- 1993 Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association and Anr. v. Union of India
- 1994 Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui Etc. v. Union of India and Ors.
- 1985 Dr. Partap Singh and Anr. v. Director of Enforcement, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and Ors.
- 1991 N.K. Jain and Others v. C.K. Shah and Others
- 1996 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. S.D. College, Hoshiarpur and Ors.
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. v. Mahakali Foods Pvt. Ltd. (unit 2) & Anr
- 2019 The Officer in Charge, Sub-regional Provident Fund Office & Anr. v. M/s Godavari Garments Limited
- 2017 Ms. Eera through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- 2013 M/s. Arcot Textile Mills Ltd. v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors.
Of those, 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.