Supreme Court of India
M/s L.N. Gadodia & Sons & Anr. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952: s. 7- of Provident Fund Act read with s. 2(9) of Delhi Shops and Establishments Act - Clubbing of two companies for the purposes of the Provident Fund Act - Two sister concerns with common directors of the same family, common Managing Director, Commercial Manager and Technical Manager, same registered address and common telephone numbers and a common gram number, employees of the two concerns being swapped - Held: The Provident Fund Commissioner was justified in drawing the inference of integrity of finance, management and
Authorities it was built on
- 1959 The Associated Cement Companies Limited, Chaibassa Cement Works, Jhinkpani v. Their Workmen
- 2007 Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/s. Rajs Continental Exports (p.) Ltd.
- 1996 Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jaipur v. M/s. Naraini Udyog and Ors.
- 1996 M/s. Rajasthan Prem Krishan Goods Transport Co. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi and Ors.
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.