Supreme Court of India
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/s. Rajs Continental Exports (p.) Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952- ), • ss. 7 & 2A-Managing Director of Respondent-concern owned a proprietorship concern-Held, that by iJself not sufficienl to estaUlish that Respondent was branch of such proprietorship concern-There was no supervisory or management control-Respondent was separately registered under the Factories Act, Central Sales Tax Act and Employees State Insurance Act-Hence, both concerns were totally independent concerns. Respondent-company claimed infancy protection under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 M/s L.N. Gadodia & Sons & Anr. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
- 2025 M/s Torino Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.