Supreme Court of India

Academy of Nutrition Improvement and Ors. v. Union of India

Neutral citation
Reported as [2011] 8 S.C.R. 680
Bench R.V. Raveendran and B. Sudershan Reddy JJ.
Decided 4 July 2011

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above and to do complete justice between 8 the parties in the interest of public health, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution, we direct the continuation of the ban contained in Rule 44-1 for a period of six months.

Judgment, page 43

From the headnote

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955: c r. 44-1 - Constitutionality of - r. 44-1 providing for restriction on sale of non-iodised common salt for human consumption - Writ petitions challenging the compulsory iodisation of sale for human consumption - Held: Government of India has taken note of scientific and medical inputs, research results and survey data to conclude that compulsory iodisation is the most effective and accepted method for elimination of iodine deficiency disorders and that consumption of iodised salt by persons not suffering from iodine deficiency will not adversely

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.