Supreme Court of India

Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2011] 5 S.C.R. 77
Bench G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly JJ.
Decided 6 April 2011

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

15 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above discussion, we do not consider it necessary to deal with the argument of Shri Ravi Shanker B Prasad and Shri Ranjit Kumar that the land could have been allotted to the Memorial Trust even though it has not been registered as a trust under the 1951 Act or the Indian Trusts Act.

Judgment, page 65

From the headnote

Constitution of India, 1950: Article 14 - Principle of equality - Exercise of power by political entities and officers/officials - Scope of - Held: For achieving the goals of Justice and Equality set out in the Preamble, the State and its agencies/instrumentalities have to function through political entities and officers/officials at different levels - The exercise of power by political entities and officers/officials for providing different kinds of services and benefits to the people always has an element of discretion, which is required to be used in larger public interest and for public

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.