Supreme Court of India
Harsh Dhingra v. State of Haryana and Ors,
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Urban Development and Town Planning : Haryana Urban 'lvelopment Authority Act, 1988: Section 30. Allotment o.f plots-Discretionary quota-High Court.formulated certain principles on which such allotments could be made' with certain corU:litions This decision held the field .for nearly a decade-Subsequently, in another decision High Court set out new principles and refused to make the decision effective prospectively-Supreme Court upheld cancellation of allotment of discretionary quota made after 3.J -10-1989-Discrimination between allottees subsequent to 31~10-1989-Avoiding of-Held:
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Varinder Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2022 M/s. Patil Automation Private Limited and Ors. v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited
- 2011 Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.