Supreme Court of India
State of U. P. & Ors. v. Neeraj Chaubey & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
HIGH COURT: c Allocation of business - Held: Full Bench of the High Court has rightly held* that the Chief Justice is the master of roster - He has full power, authority and jurisdiction in the matter of allocation of business of the High Court which flows not only from the provisions contained in sub-section (3) of 0 s. 51 of the States Re-organisation Act, 1956, but inheres in him in the very nature of things - The Chief Justice enjoys a special status and he alone can assign work to a Judge sitting alone and to the Judges sitting in Division Bench or Full Bench - He has jurisdiction to
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 Kishore Samrite v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2011 State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Ors. Etc
- 2018 Shanti Bhushan v. Supreme Court of India through its Registrar and Another
- 2013 Union of India & Anr. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.