Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Hari Chand
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
PENAL CODE, 1860: s.302- Murder- Two accused caught hold of the victim c and two shot him dead - conviction of two accused by trial court - Acquittal by High Court - On grounds of variance in testimonies of eye witnesses and medical evidence - Held: Conclusions of High Court are full of surmises and conjectures - There was no reason for High Court to discard credible, 0 cogent and trustworthy evidence of eye-witnesses - Oral testimony regarding injuries caused by firearms is amply corroborated by medical evidence.....: This was not a case where medical evidence was at variance with ocular
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Yogesh Singh v. Mahabeer Singh & Ors.
- 2012 Darbara Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2012 Sayed Darain A.hsan @ Darain v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
- 2011 Rakesh & Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2018 Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2011 Bhajan Singh @ Harbhajan Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Of those, 4 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.