Supreme Court of India

Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu v. State of West Bengal

Neutral citation
Reported as [2009] 15 S.C.R. 836
Bench Dr. Mukundakam Sharma and R.M. Lodha JJ.
Decided 11 November 2009

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

20 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid situation and position, we have examined the provision of clause thirdly which provides that a G person would be held to have abetted the doing of a thing when he intentionally does or omits to do anything in order to aid the commission of that thing.

Judgment, page 11

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860: s. 306 - Applicability of - Held: For applicability of s. 306, there must be a case of suicide and in the commission of suicide, person said to have abetted it must have played active role by an act of instigation or by doing certain act to facilitate the commission of suicide - On facts, appellant brought another woman to his house - Allegations of mental and physical torture on deceased-wife - After about three months. o of second marriage by the appellant, deceased committed suicide - Conviction of appellant by courts below under s.306 not maintainable as from the period

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.