Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Yaseen v. State of U.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-s. 482-Appellant convicted under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954---Conviction upheld by Appellate Court-Revision rejected-Petition u/s. 482 to recall that order-High Court held that once the appeal has been decided on merits, it is not open to exercise power under s. 482-Held: High Court right in holding that the application under s. 482 is to be dismissed Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954-s. 20AA-Adulteration in food-Accused raising plea of being under age of 18 years on the date of !- occurrence and seeking grant of probation-Question
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Kishorilal (d) Thr. L.rs v. Gopal
- 2023 Rajesh Jain v. Ajay Singh
- 2023 Shivshankara & Anr v. H.P. Vedavyasa Char
- 2019 The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Uday Singh
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.