Supreme Court of India
Suresh Pathrella v. Oriental Bank of Commerce
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, these appeals being devoid of merits are, accordingly, dismissed.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Service law: Termination-Misappropriation of funds of customer by Bank Officer Dismissal after giving opportunity to cross-examine the witness and obtaining opinion of handwriting expert-Challenge against-Held, judicial review not warranted as dismissal not tainted with ma/a fides nor in violation of principle of natural justice-Officer had acted beyond his authority in breach of Bank's Regulation-It is a case of loss of confidence in officer by Bank Fact that no loss caused to bank not a ground to take lenient view for proved misconduct-Administrative law-Judicial review-Oriental Bank of
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Heem Singh
- 2024 M/s Bharti Airtel Limited v. A.S. Raghavendra
- 2015 Chauharya Tripathi & Ors. v. L.L.C. of India & Ors.
- 2013 Commissioner of Police, New Delhi & Anr. v. Mehar Singh
- 2010 The General Manager (p) Punjab & Sino Bank & Ors. v. Daya Singh
Of those, 1 relied on · 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.