Supreme Court of India
Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
38 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that Order VIII Rule I, though couched in mandatory form, is directory being a provision in the domain of processual law. c We sum up and briefly state our conclusions as under :- (i) The trial of an election petition commences from the date of the receipt of the election petition by the Court and continues till the date of its decision.
Judgment, page 22
From the headnote
Representation of the People Act, 1951 : Sections 86 and. 87-Election Petition- 'Trial '-Commencement of- limitation for filing written statement-Applicability of Order VIII, Rule / Extension of time beyond 90 days-Held, trial of an election petition commences from the date of receipt of election petition and continues till date of its decision -Receiving written statement being part of trial, time can be extended-This power emanates from the Act itself and the Rules framed for the purpose of the Act and resort to provisions ofCPC is not called for-Even otherwise, power of Court to extend
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 R. Nagaraj (dead) through Lrs. and Another v. Rajmani and Others
- 2024 Child in Conflict with Law through His Mother v. The State of Karnataka and Another
- 2018 The State of Bihar & Ors. v. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
- 2017 M/s. Surendra Trading Company v. M/s. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited And. Others
- 2012 C.N. Ramappa Gowda v. C.C. Chandregowda (dead) by Lrs. & Anr.
- 2011 Mahadev Govind Gharge & Others v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Krishna Project, Jamkhandi, Karnataka
- 2024 Dr. Vijay Dixit & Ors. v. Pagadal Krishna Mohan & Ors.
- 2024 Pic Departmentals Pvt. Ltd. v. Sreeleathers Pvt. Ltd.
- 2024 High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2023 Yashpal Jain v. Sushila Devi & Others
- 2022 Sathyanath & Anr. v. Sarojamani
- 2021 Diamond Exports & Anr. v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
- 2021 Union of India v. Manraj Enterprises
- 2021 Subodh Kumar v. Shamim Ahmed
- 2020 National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India v. Alimenta S.A.
- 2020 Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.
- 2019 M/s Dalmia Power Limited & Anr. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1, Trichy
- 2019 M/s Scg Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K. S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- 2013 Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
- 2013 Noor Mohammed v. Jethanand and Another
- 2024 V.S. Palanivel v. P. Sriram, Cs, Liquidator, Etc.
- 2021 Government of Maharashtra (water Resources Department) Represented by Executive Engineer v. M/s Borse Brothers Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
- 2019 Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2019 J K Jute Mill Mazdoor Morcha v. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Ltd. through its Director
- 2017 Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur
- 2016 Jagatjit Industries Limited v. The Intellectual Property Appellace Board & Ors.
- 2015 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.
- 2011 Kalyan Singh Chouhan v. C.P. Joshi
- 2009 Lakshmi & Anr. v. Chinnammal @ Rayyammal & Ors.
- 2008 Vidyabai & Ors. v. Padmalatha & Anr.
- 2008 Mohammed Yusuf v. Faij Mohammad & Ors.
- 2008 Usha Devi v. Rijwan Ahamd & Ors.
- 2007 M/s R.N. Jadi & Brothers and Ors. v. Subhashchandra
- 2007 M/s Aditya Hotels (p) Ltd. v. Bombay Swadeshi Stores Ltd. and Ors.
- 2006 Ajendraprasadji N. Pande and Anr. v. Swami Keshav Prakeshdasji N. and Ors.
- 2005 Shaikh Salim Haji Abdul Khayumsab v. Kumar and Ors.
- 2005 Rani Kusum v. Kanchan Devi and Ors.
- 2022 M/s. Patil Automation Private Limited and Ors. v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited
Of those, 6 relied on · 1 distinguished · 14 referred to · 17 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.