Supreme Court of India
Nirmal Jeet Kaur v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Proceedure, 197 3-Sections 439 & 438-Application in terms of s.439 pursuant to order passed on application under s.438- Requirement of applicant being in custody-Held, protection given to accused by High Court while application under S. 439 was pending not sustainable-Accused to surrender to custody so that his application under s.439 can be taken for disposal-Penal Code, 1860-Section 498A & 506 r/ws 34-Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961-Sections 3 & 4. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Sections 438 & 439-Distinction between orders under S. 438 and S. 439. Constitution of India,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- 2011 State of Orissa & Anr. v. Mamata Mohanty
- 2022 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- 2018 Sushila Aggarwal & Ors. v. State (nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- 2012 Rashmi Rekha Thatoi & Anr. v. State of Orissa & Ors.
- 2011 Abhay Singh Chautala v. C.b.i
- 2017 Manju Devi v. Onkarjit Singh Ahluwalia @ Omkarjeet Singh & Others
- 2014 Usha Bharti v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 4 referred to · 2 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.