Supreme Court of India
Lalit Mohan Pandey v. Pooran Singh and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that in the instant case the appellant herein had received the highest number of first preference votes and in that view of the matter he should have been declared D elected.
Judgment, page 30
From the headnote
Panchayats: Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961--Section 237-Uttar Pradesh Zila Panchayats (Election of Adhyaksha and Up-Adhyaksha and Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1994-Rules 33, 34, Clauses 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Schedule-Constitution of India, · 1950, Article 243C: Hare system-Single Transferable Votes Method/Proportional representation System-Applicability of · Three candidates contesting in an election-Appellant, first respondent and one receiving six, five and one, first preference votes, respectively Upon elimination of , Appellant and first
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors. v. M/s Bajaj Auto Ltd. & Anr.
- 2013 Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.