Supreme Court of India
Dr. Karan Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that no interference is C called for in the impugned judgment of the High Court.
Judgment, page 22
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950 : Article 363-Disputes arising out of treaties, agreements, covenants etc.- Bar to interference-By Courts-Writ petition-Maintainability of-Ex-Ruler entered into an agreement before commencement of Constitution-The said ex-Ruler, in a correspondence to the Union of India, had given a list of his private properties which did not include certain "articles" and was accepted by the latter-Ex-Ruler's son filed a writ petition claiming the said "articles" as private properties of the Ruler family-Held: The said correspondence would amount to an "agreement" within the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 V. Kalyanaswamy (d) by Lrs. & Anr. v. L. Bakthavatsalam (d) by Lrs. & Ors.
- 2015 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Maharani Ushadevi
- 2019 Prabhakar Gones Prabhu Navelkar (dead) through Lrs & Ors. v. Saradchandra Suria Prabhu Navelkar (dead) through Lrs. & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.