Supreme Court of India

Sushil Murmu v. State of Jharkhand

Neutral citation
Reported as [2003] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 702
Bench Doraiswamy Raju and Arijit Pasayat JJ.
Decided 12 December 2003

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above position, we do not think this -to be a fit case where any interference is called for, E looking to the background facts highlighted above.

Judgment, page 13

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860/Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Sections 201, 3021354(3)-Sacrifice of a young child-Severing and throwing the head of the child in a pond-Death sentence awarded by trial court-High Court confirming the death sentence-Correctness of-Held, on facts, this is a fit case to be treated as 'r:irest of rarest cases '-Hence conviction and death sentence upheld. 9-year old child was sacrificed before Goddess Kali by the appellant. The appellant severed the head of the child and threw it in a pond. The trial court found the appellant guilty under sectiOns 302 and 201 IPC and awarded death

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.