Supreme Court of India
Tulshidas Kanolkar v. The State of Goa
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860-Sections 376 and 506(2)-Rape-Mentally challenged victim-Delay in lodging FIR-Consent-Plea of Held, on facts, victim is totally unaware of dreadful consequences-Hence, there is no delay in lodging FIR-Mentally challenged victim cannot legally give consent to sexual intercourse Legislature advised to prescribe higher minimum sentence for rape of mentally challenged victim. Appellant accused committed rape of a mentally challenged victim·several times. The parents of the victim came to know of it on seeing the legs of the victim being swollen and signs of advanced stage of
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar @ Sunny
- 2019 Parkash Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2014 State of Rajasthan v. Roshan Khan & Ors.
- 2004 State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shree Kant Shekari
- 2017 Ms. Eera through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 2 mentioned · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.