Supreme Court of India
Ravinder Singh @ Bittu v. The State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. Sections 3 and 4 read with Section 120 !PC-Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302 read with 34, 307 read with 34 and 392 read with 34. Explosive Substances Act, 1984- s.3.-Arms Act, 1959-s.25. Prosecution under-Reliance on corifessional statements of accused, co-accused and on prosecution witnesses-Conviction-- On appeal conviction upheld. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987-Section 15--Corifessional statements-Reliance on-Corroboration for-Held, voluntary and truthfal statement does not require corroboration. Appellant-accused and
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Sanjay Dutt (a-117) v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi (stf), Bombay
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.