Supreme Court of India

State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Chaganlal Raghana and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2001] 3 S.C.R. 840
Bench K.T. Thomas and R.P. Sethi JJ.
Decided 11 July 2001

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

10 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

From the headnote

Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 : Sections 3(2), 3(3). 3(5), 5 and 6. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987 Rule I 5(5). Indian Penal Code, 1860 : Sections : 302, 307, 120- and 384 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : Section 222 Contract killing-Murder-Accused-Confession-Rule 15(5)­ Procedure for recording confession-Compliance with-Confession voluntarily made and legally recorded-Confession also stood corroborated on facts-Rejection of such a confession held not valid-Confession held sufficient to hold the accused guilty of hatching the

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.