Supreme Court of India
P.P. Unikrishnan and Anr. v. Puttiyottil Alikutty and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons we are not inclined to afford the benefit envisaged in Section 64(3) of the K.P. Act to the appellants.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Kera/a Police Act, 1960 : Section 64(3)-Scope of-Police Officer-Offences Committed by-Bar against taking cognizance-Held, not confined to offences specified in the Act-Bar encompasses offences under other enactments-Period of limitation for taking cognizance-Held, cannot be extended under Section.473 Cr.P. . Police Officer-Illegally confining and assaulting a person in Police Station-Benefit of Section 64(3) held not available to the Police Officer. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 197(1)-Section 64 of Kera/a Police Act, 1960-Dijference between. Sectii:>n 64(3) of the Kerala Police
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Surinderjit Singh Mand & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2016 Devinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab through Cbi
- 2013 Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.