Supreme Court of India
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Tara Dutt and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860/Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947/Criminal Procedure Code, 1973: Sections 109, 417, 465, 468, 420 and 120- !Section 5 (2)/Sections 468 and 473-Respondents charged for the offences under Sections 468, 420 and 120- -Cognizance taken four years after the commission-Trial Court acquitted respondents of the said charges but convicted them under Sections 417, 465 and 109-0n appeal the High Court acquitted the respondents of the charges under Sections 417, 465 and 109 also on the ground of cognizance being barred by limitation-On appeal- Held, /imitation for offences is for the
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Udai Shankar Awasthi v. State of U.P. Anr.
- 2013 Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.