Supreme Court of India
Balbir v. State of Haryana and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons we decline to confinn the conviction passed on the appellant.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 223 : Joint trial-Two cases-One instituted on private complaint and the other on police report-Accused did not raise a contention before tria•I court that joint trial of both the cases be ordered-Effect-Held: Such a contention cannot be raised at any later stage-Criminal Trial. Joint trial-Decision on-Duty of court-Procedure-Two cases-One instituted on private complaint and the other on police report-Two diametrically divergent versions without anything in common except that the murdered person was the same-Held: The two trials should be separately
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 Kuldip Yadav & Ors. v. State of Bihar
- 2024 Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2021 In Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 of N.I. Act 1881 v..
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.