Supreme Court of India
State of Maharashtra v. Vishwanath Tukaram Umale & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
c Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966-S. 3-Conviction under-"Possession of property need not be a subsisting possession."-Suf]icient if accused proved to "have been in possession" of property at any point of time. Indian Penal Code-S. 379-Transfer of possession of the property however tran,sient, lln essential ingredient of an offence of theft. Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 pro vides penalty for unlawful possession of railway property, the essential require. ments being (1) the property in question should be railway property (2) it should
Where later benches applied it
- 2008 Om Prakash v. State of U.P.
- 2003 Sarva Shramik Sangh v. Mis. Indian Smelting and Refining Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- 2001 Cipla Ltd. v. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union and Ors.
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.