Supreme Court of India

Romesh Chandra Mehta v. State of West Bengal

Neutral citation
Reported as [1969] 2 S.C.R. 461
Bench J. C. Shah, V. Ramaswami, G. K. Mitter, K. S. Hegde and A. N. Grover JJ.
Decided 18 October 1968

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that a Customs Officer is under the Act of 1962 not a police officer within the meaning of s. 25 of the Evidence Act and the statements made before him by a person who is arrested or against whom an inquiry is made are not covered by s. 25 of the Indian Evidence Act.

Judgment, page 19

From the headnote

Sea Customs Act (8 of 1878), and Customs Act (52 of 1962)-Cus­ toms Officer-If police officer within the meaning of s. 25 of the Evi­ dence Act (1 of 1872). The accused were charged with some offences under s. 120- Indian Penal Code read with s. 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, s. S of the Import and Export Control Act, 1947, for specific offences under the Sea Customs Act, and for offences under ss. 108 and 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. Statements made by the accused to an officer of customs in an enquiry under s. 171- of the Sea Customs Act and statements made were tendered in

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.