Supreme Court of India
Sanjay Badaya v. State of Rajasthan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that it would serve no fruitful purpose to keep the appellants under further pre-trial custody.
Judgment, page 7
In brief
An ACB preliminary enquiry led to FIR No. 245/2024 alleging a conspiracy and large-scale financial irregularities in the Jal Jeevan Mission works of the Rajasthan PHED, in which two contracting firms allegedly used forged IRCON work-experience certificates to secure eligibility for about 104 tenders worth Rs. 979.45 crore. Shubhanshu Dixit, then Secretary of the RWSSMB and de facto Secretary of the PHED Finance Committee, was alleged to have suppressed whistleblower complaints and legal notices about the forged certificates and to have participated in Finance Committee meetings approving the tainted firms' bids; he was arrested on 17 February 2026.…
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the Supreme Court's own signed PDF — the original file as the Registry published it, not a copy somebody has watermarked or re-branded
An email address, no password.