Supreme Court of India
The State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajesh Kumar @ Munnu
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court acquitting the accused u/ss.376 and 452 IPC. Headnotes† Penal Code, 1860 – ss.376 and 452 – Rape – Non-allowance of medical examination by prosecutrix – Delay in lodging FIR – Trial court convicted the accused-respondent for forcibly committing sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix, however, acquitted by the High Court due to glaring lacunae in the prosecution case – Interference: Held: Interference not called for – Mother of the prosecutrix declared hostile – Father of the prosecutrix made
Authorities it was built on
- 2011 State of U.P. v. Chhoteylal
- 1999 State of U.P. v. Dharmendra Singh and Anr. Etc.
- 1990 Sham Sunder v. Puran and Anr.
- 1979 Municipal Council, Pusad v. Gokaldas Dossa & Co. Ltd.
- 2011 Gosu Jairami Reddy & Anr. v. State of A.P.
- 2020 Parminder Kaur @ P.P. Kaur @ Soni v. State of Punjab
- 1975 Govind Sugar Mills Ltd. & Anr v. Hind Mazdoor Sabha & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.