Supreme Court of India
Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above findings, we are not deciding the issue of violation of Article 22(2) of the Constitution.
Judgment, page 26
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration The main issue canvassed by the appellant in this appeal is the violation of the appellant’s right under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India as the appellant was not informed of the grounds for his arrest. Headnotes† Constitution of India – Art.22(1) – Mandatory requirement under: Held: [Per Abhay S. Oka, J.] The requirement of informing a person arrested of grounds of arrest is a mandatory requirement of Article 22(1). [Para 21(a)] Constitution of India – Art.22(1) – What is the manner of informing the arrested person of his grounds of arrest: Held: [Per Abhay
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Another
- 2025 Kasireddy Upender Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.