Supreme Court of India
State of Chhattisgarh v. Amit Aishwarya Jogi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the High Court ought to have adopted a more liberal and pragmatic approach in dealing with CBI’s application seeking condonation of delay and should have examined application seeking leave to appeal applicable on its merits.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether the three-Judge Bench judgment in the case of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Anr. lays down the correct proposition of law, or whether the same requires reference to, and resolution by a larger bench. Headnotes† Position of Law – Case of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Anr, 2010 INSC 188 : [2010] 4 SCR 334 – Whether a different view required: Held: No reason to take a different view. [Para 22] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302, 341, 427, 120- r/w. s.34 – Arms Act, 1959 – ss.25, 27 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.378 – Murder of
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.