Supreme Court of India
Haryana Power Purchase Centre (hppc) and Others v. Gmr Kamalanga Energy Limited and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, contention of Haryana that the tapering linkage granted in relation to coal block cannot be linked to 300 MW is wrong.
Judgment, page 32
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration The APTEL dismissed the appeals (Appeal no.135 of 2018 along with Appeal no.54 of 2019) and upheld the order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) in Petition No.105/MP/20173. Headnotes† Electricity Act, 2003 – Electricity Appeals – When experts bodies like the CERC, the APTEL and the Central Electricity Authority have taken a particular view: Held: When various expert bodies like the CERC, the APTEL and the Central Electricity Authority after considering the relevant material on record have taken a particular view, the Court
Authorities it was built on
- 2017 Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. Etc.
- 2023 Gmr Warora Energy Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (cerc) & Ors.
- 2023 Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited and Others
- 2023 Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Anr v. Adani Power (mundra) Limited & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.