Supreme Court of India
Rohit Kochhar v. Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd. & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether the relief sought by the plaintiff in respect to the suit property can be entirely obtained through the personal obedience of the defendants warranting the application of the proviso to Section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Headnotes† Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Proviso to s.16 – When not applicable – Suit for specific performance of the contract in respect of the suit property situated in Gurugram, filed in the Delhi High Court – Single Judge held that the suit was maintainable in view of proviso to s.16 – Appeals filed by the defendants were
Authorities it was built on
- 2011 Deutsche Post Bank Home Finance Ltd. v. Taduri Sridhar and Anr.
- 2005 Harshad Chiman Lal Modi v. D.L.F., Universal Ltd. and Anr.
- 1982 Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal & Ors.
- 2001 Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Daulat and Anr.
- 2015 Excel Dealcomm Private Limited v. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited & Ors.
- 1992 Smt. Nirmala R. Bafna/kershi Shivax Cambatta and Ors. v. Khandesh Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. and Anr./official Liquidator and Ors.
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.