Supreme Court of India
Tinku v. State of Haryana & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Issue for Consideration Whether the appellant was entitled to appointment on compassionate grounds. Headnotes† Service Law – Appointment on compassionate grounds – When not entitled to – Appellant’s father, a constable died on duty in 1997 when he was seven years old – Appellant claimed appointment on compassionate grounds in 2008 after attaining majority – Claim rejected being time barred in view of the 1999 policy which introduced three years limit for attainment of the age of majority from the date of death of the deceased employee: Held: Compassionate appointment is an exception to the
Authorities it was built on
- 2009 Shanti Sports Club & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 1995 Chandigarh Administration and Anr v. Jagjit Singh and Anr. Etc.
- 2013 Basawaraj & Anr. v. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
- 1994 Umesh Kumar Nagpal Etc. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- 2022 R. Muthukumar & Ors. v. The Chairman and Managing Director Tangedco & Ors.
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.