Supreme Court of India

Dbs Bank Limited Singapore v. Ruchi Soya Industries Limited and Another

Neutral citation
Reported as [2024] 1 S.C.R. 114
Bench Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti JJ.
Decided 3 January 2024

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the above reasons, reject the submission on behalf of the respondents that Section 30(2)(b)(ii) is unworkable because it involves deeming fiction relating to liquidation, which is inapplicable during the CIRP period.

Judgment, page 24

From the headnote

Issue for Consideration Whether s.30(2)(b)(ii) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended in 2019, entitles the dissenting financial creditor to be paid the minimum value of its security interest; whether the amendments made in the substantive portion of s.30(2), in terms of Explanation 2 will be applicable when the first appeal was heard by NCLAT. Headnotes Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – s.30(2)(b)(ii) – Interpretation: Held: s.30(2)(b)(ii) forfends the dissenting financial creditor from settling for a lower amount payable under the resolution plan – financial creditor

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.