Supreme Court of India
Manjunath & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons, the judgment impugned before us in Criminal Appeal Number 1795 of 2004 dated 21 September 2010, is set aside.
Judgment, page 33
From the headnote
Issue for consideration: In a case primarily involving a dying declaration in addition to the ocular and circumstantial evidence, the Trial Court acquitted the appellants-accused along with other accused per sons, whether the High Court was justifi ed in overturning the same in respect of the appellants. Evidence – Dying declaration – Reliance upon in addition to the ocular and circumstantial evidence – Legality: Held: The dying declaration, although undoubtedly a substantive piece of evidence upon which reliance can be placed, in the present facts is rendered nugatory as the person who took
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Govind v. State of Haryana
- 2026 Syed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Khadri v. Syed Mohammed Adil Pasha Khadri.
- 2025 Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj Yadav v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2025 Rajendra Singh and Ors. v. State of Uttaranchal Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.