Supreme Court of India
Harvinder Singh @ Bachhu v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Resultantly, the order of acquittal passed by the trial court stands restored.
Judgment, page 24
From the headnote
Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in setting aside the order of acquittal and convicting the appellant for murder and attempt to rape relying on the testimony of the prosecution witnes s despite contradictions, only because he was educated and a god fear ing person. Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 302, 376, 511, 454, 380 r/w s.34 – Murder and attempt to rape – High Court convicted the appellant for murder and attempt to rape, setting aside the order of acquittal by the tri al court – Correctness: Held: Trial court gave substantial reasons for arriving at its conclusion –
Authorities it was built on
- 1973 Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade & Anr v. State of Maharashtra
- 1984 Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
- 1957 Vadivelu Thevar v. The State of Madras
- 1990 Hiraji Tolaji Bagwan v. Shakuntala
- 2009 Arulvelu and Another v. State Represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another
- 2014 Durga Burman (roy) v. State of Sikkim
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.