Supreme Court of India
Appaiya v. Andimuthu @ Thangapandi & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was correct in holding that owing to the non-production of any document by appellant evincing as to how the sons’ of the seller obtained the suit property in a partition Exhibit A1-registered sale deed whereby the property was sold to the appellant’s vendor, being a registration copy-secondary evidence, could not be admitted in evidence as proof of the contents of its original. Evidence Act, 1872 – s. 65(e), 74, 76, 77 and 79 – Registration Act, 1908 – s. 57(5) – Admissibility in evidence of certifi ed copies in property matters – Certifi ed copy
Authorities it was built on
- 2001 Santosh Hazarl v. Purushottam Tiwarl (dead) by Lrs
- 2008 National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vidhyadhar Mahariwala & Ors.
- 1999 K.S. Subbiah Pillai v. The Commissioner of Income Tax
- 2006 Lankeshwar Malakar and Ors. v. R. Deka and Ors.
- 2017 Sk. Bhikan S/o Sk Noor Mohd. v. Mehamoodabee W/o Sk. Afzal & Ors.
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.