Supreme Court of India
Rohit Chaudhary & Anr. v. M/s Vipul Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Issue for consideration: The interpretation of the word and expression “Commercial Purpose” defi ned u/s. 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – ‘Commercial purpose’ – Not defi ned in the Act – The Explanation (added by Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993: Held: The expression ‘commercial purpose’ has not been defi ned under the Act – In the absence thereof one have to go by its ordinary m eaning – ‘Commercial’ denotes “pertaining to commerce”; it means ‘c onnected’ with or engaged in commerce; mercantile; “having profi t as the main aim”; relate
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Vinit Bahri v. M/s Mgf Developers Ltd.
- 2024 M/s Daimler Chrysler India Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Controls & Switchgear Company Ltd. & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.