Supreme Court of India
Yashodhan Singh & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid discussion, we do not think that the judgment in Jogendra Yadav calls for any re-consideration and the said observation in paragraph 9 as extracted supra is relata ble only to the facts of the said case.
Judgment, page 25
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.319 – Principl e of hearing a person who is summoned u/s. 319 Cr.P. . – Applicability of – Respondent no.2-complainant got an FIR registered u/ss . 147, 148, 149, 302, 452, 307, 504 of IPC – charge-shee t was filed against the accused persons but the names of appella nts were not mentioned in it as their role was under investigation – Res pondent no.2 filed application u/s. 319 Cr.P. . to summon appellants – Tr ial Court summoned appellants to join trial – High Court affirme d the order passed by the trial Court – Before the Suprem e Court, appellant
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Jamin & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- 2025 Yadwinder Singh v. Lakhi Alias Lakhwinder Singh & Anr. Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.