Supreme Court of India
The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors v. Rachna Hills & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the High Court has committed an error in coming to the conclusion that the Respondent nos. 1 to 3 have acquired a vested right to be appointed.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Service Law: Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education ct, 1921: ss. 16- , 16-FF – Appointment of teachers in minority institutions – Procedure for selection and appointment – Initiation of the process of selection of teachers – Proposals forw arded to the District Inspector of Schools-DIOS for approval – However, before the grant of the requisite approval, Regn 17 was amended, prescribing a new selection procedure – Thereafter, DIOS returned the p roposal for compliance with the new procedure – Writ petitions c hallenging the decision of DIOS – High Court held that once the names are forwarded
Authorities it was built on
- 2008 Rangaiah v. State of Karnataka
- 1959 N. R. Grose Alias Nikhil Ranjan Grose v. The State of West Bengal
- 2011 Deepak Agarwal & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2019 Rajasthan State Sports Council & Anr. v. Smt. Uma Dadhich & Anr.
- 1997 Smt. Raj Kumari Cecil v. Managing Committee of Laxmi Narain Bhagwati Devi Vidya Mandir, Girls High School
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.