Supreme Court of India
Anoop Bartaria & Etc v. Dy. Director Enforcement Directorate & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – s.3 – Offe nce of money laundering – Knowledge of dealing with the proce eds of crime, if sine qua non for– Held: No – Knowledge of the accused that he was dealing with proceeds of crime is not a condition precedent or sine qua non required to be shown by the prosecution for lodging the complaint under the Act – Apart fro m having knowledge, if a person who directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or is actually involved in the process or activity connected wi th the proceeds of crime, is also guilty of the offence of money laundering – In the
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.