Supreme Court of India
Soundarajan v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police Vigilance Anticorruption Dindigul
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 : ss. 7, 13(1)(d), r/ w 13(2) – Illegal gratification – Appellant-Sub-Registrar d emanded gratification of Rs.500/- from the complainant-PW 2 , for handing over the registered sale deed – Complaint filed – Trap l aid and in presence of shadow witness PW-3, the appellant caught re d-handed while accepting the bribe – However, complainant did n ot support the prosecution and was declared hostile – Trial co urt convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences punishab le u/s 7 and s. 13(2) r/w s. 13(1)(d) – Upheld by the High Court – O n appeal, held : To
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Sushil Kumar Tiwari v. Hare Ram Sah & Ors.
- 2024 M/s Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Limited and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.